🔒

What changed on your sites today

Private deliverable. Enter the hub password to continue.

That's not right. Try again.

← Back to the hub

What changed on your sites today

Ten of your sites got the same reading fix. The numbers didn't land, so here it is in pictures instead. August 2, 2026.

What was actually wrong

Your pages had two faults at the same time. The text was too small, and the lines of text ran too far across the screen. Put those together and reading gets tiring fast. Your eye travels a long way to reach the end of a line, then has to hunt back across the page to find where the next one starts. Miss by a line and you read the same sentence twice without noticing.

The reason nobody flagged it is that it doesn't look broken. Small text in a wide column looks like a perfectly ordinary web page. It just quietly wears the reader down, and they leave a bit sooner than they would have. That's the whole problem, and that's why it was invisible.

How to read the pictures below

On the left is the page the way it was this morning. On the right is that same page as it is right now, live. Both pictures were taken at the same screen width, on the same page, so the only thing different between them is the thing we changed. Nothing else moved.


SEO Believer

The worst of the four. Lines ran 137 characters across, roughly twice as far as they should. They're 68 now, and the text is noticeably bigger. Instead of stretching wall to wall, the words sit in a proper column.

Before

The SEO Believer Longmont page before the fix, with small text running the full width of the screen.

After

The same SEO Believer page now, with larger text in a narrower reading column.

Cure Canine Disease

Almost the same story: 134 characters a line, now 71. This one matters more than most, because the people reading it have a sick dog and they're reading in a hurry. Bigger text, and the lines stop before they run off toward the edge.

Before

The Cure Canine Disease distemper page before the fix, with small text spanning the whole screen.

After

The same distemper page now, with larger text in a contained reading column.

Taste Boulder

This one is the opposite problem, and it's worth saying so, because otherwise the pair looks like a mistake. The column here was already a sensible width. The fault was that the text was tiny, the smallest on any site you own. So the two pictures look similar in shape, and the difference you're looking for is the size of the words, not the width of the block. Lines went from 90 characters to 69.

Before

The Taste Boulder Mexican restaurants page before the fix, with very small text in a narrow column.

After

The same Taste Boulder page now, with the text at a comfortable reading size.

TrainerBooked

A milder version of the same fault: 103 characters a line, now 71. The column wasn't especially wide here, but the text was small enough that the lines still ran long.

Before

The TrainerBooked pricing article before the fix, with small text and long lines.

After

The same TrainerBooked article now, with larger text and shorter lines.

Everything fixed today

Ten sites, all measured the same way: how many characters fit on one line of body text before, and how many fit now. Smaller is better here, up to a point, and that point is the last row of this page.

SiteCharacters a line, beforeCharacters a line, now
SEO Believer13768
Cure Canine Disease13471
Verity Agentic11272
TrainerBooked10371
OutdoorBoulder9971
Taste Boulder9070
MedSpasBoulder8570
BoulderThingsToDo8570
Testosterone in Women8070
This hub, every page of it12670

The standard, for next time

You set this on August 1: body text lands between 65 and 75 characters a line, and it's at least 20 pixels tall. All ten sites now sit inside that band, and so does the page you're reading. It would have been embarrassing if it didn't.