SEO Believer AI Whitespace (Extended)
Internal strategy reference. Enter hub password to continue.
That's not right. Try again.
SEO Believer: AI Whitespace Extended Test
AI-Whitespace Test (EXTENDED): 4 New Verticals + Nationwide HRT
Created: 2026-06-01
Extends: ai-whitespace-DIRECT-test-2026-06-01.md (med spas + dentistry, direct 6-engine) and ai-whitespace-test-boulder-denver.md (the original proxy).
Purpose: Two new probes. PART A: four medical verticals never whitespace-checked (LASIK/cataract, cosmetic surgery, fertility/IVF, orthodontics) across Boulder + Denver. PART B: how open the LOCAL, in-person HRT/TRT/pellet ground is to AI across five geographically diverse US metros, and whether AI defaults to telehealth brands (Hims/Defy) instead of brick-and-mortar clinics.
1. Method note
Same method and rigor as the prior direct test: AI answer engines were queried live and answers captured as page text.
| Engine | How queried | Coverage this run |
|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | perplexity.ai via URL query params, Annette's Chrome session | Primary engine. ~15 queries across both parts. Returns either a prose answer with cited sources or a Google-Maps-driven "Places" widget (local intent triggers the widget). A "complete payment" enterprise banner appeared mid-session but did not block capture. |
| Grok | grok.com via URL query param, signed in (SuperGrok) | 1 prose answer (HRT Denver) for the telehealth-vs-local cross-check. Visibly searched the web + Reddit. |
| ChatGPT | DataForSEO ai_optimization/chat_gpt/llm_responses/live, gpt-4o-mini, web_search on | 2 sampled queries (HRT Denver, cosmetic surgery Boulder). Answer text lives in items[].sections[].text, links carry utm_source=openai. |
| Claude | not run this pass | Browser budget went to Perplexity breadth + Grok/ChatGPT cross-checks. Prior direct test already characterized Claude as the richest prose engine that never refuses a local rec. |
| Gemini / Google AI Overviews | not run | Follow-up candidates, as before. |
Metros chosen for PART B (size + region spread): Boulder CO (small), Denver CO (mid), Phoenix AZ (large SW), Nashville TN (mid SE), Tampa FL (mid SE/retiree), Austin TX (large SW/TX).
DataForSEO spend this session: 5 live calls at ~$0.0271 each = ~$0.136 total. Under the $0.15 cap (the first 3 calls included two empty-parse probes that still billed; noted so the next run parses sections on the first try).
2. PART A: four new verticals (Boulder + Denver)
Verdict table
| Vertical | Boulder | Denver | Single cost-authority? | Case-study read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LASIK / cataract | Winnable, leaning closed , one name (Dishler Laser Institute) anchors Perplexity's prose answer as the default | Closed-ish on cost , chains + national aggregators own it | No local one (cost spread across chains + lasik.com) | Low priority. A single incumbent + national chains. |
| Cosmetic / plastic surgery | Open , Places widget, no name lock; ChatGPT prose names a totally different surgeon set than Perplexity's Maps set | Open but crowded , 8+ practices in the Places widget, fragmented | No (each practice cites its own pricing page) | Winnable, high deal value, but crowded in Denver. |
| Fertility / IVF | Closed , same two regional chains (Conceptions/RMA, CCRM) spill over from Denver metro | Closed , CCRM + Conceptions/RMA own the Places widget and prose | Emerging local one: denverfertilitycare (cited repeatedly on IVF-cost) | Drop. Two chains own the ground; review-count moats are huge. |
| Orthodontics | Winnable , Places widget, fragmented (Yamashiro, Boulder Orthodontics, Boulder Smile Design) | Winnable, awards-driven , prose leans on 5280 Mag / Colorado Parent award signals | YES on cost: dentistsranked aggregator dominates "braces cost Boulder" | Best of the four. Clear cost-authority opening (see below). |
Per-vertical detail
LASIK / cataract
- Perplexity "best LASIK surgeon Boulder": prose led by Dishler Laser Institute ("30+ years, 100,000+ procedures") as the default #1, then UCHealth Boulder, Boulder Eye Surgeons, TLC LASIK. Dishler is functionally the entrenched name AI reaches for first.
- Perplexity "LASIK cost Denver": $1,800-$5,000/eye, cited to chains and aggregators (20/20 Institute, Hines Sight, LasikPlus, lasik.com). No local cost authority; national chains own the number.
- Read: a mature category dominated by one experience-leader (Boulder) and national chains (Denver). Thin opening.
Cosmetic / plastic surgery
- Perplexity "best cosmetic surgery Boulder": Places widget only , Boulder Plastic Surgery (4.8, 408), Alpine Surgical (4.8, 288), Boulder Valley Plastic Surgery (4.9, 167).
- Perplexity "best plastic surgeon Denver": large Places widget, 8+ names (Aesthetic Surgery & Dermatology of Cherry Creek, Denver Plastic Surgery, Jack Zamora MD, AirSculpt, Thompson Facial Plastics...). Fragmented.
- ChatGPT "best cosmetic surgeon Boulder": prose names individual surgeons (Dr. Kyle Cox, Dr. Peter Schmid, Dr. Nathan Roesner, Dr. Jeffrey Swail, Dr. Debora Ma) , a completely different set from Perplexity's Maps names. No cross-engine name lock = genuine opening, but high-trust/board-certification vertical with big review counts.
- Perplexity tummy-tuck-cost Denver: $15k-$28k, each practice citing its own pricing page (Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Colorado Plastic Surgery, Broadway, Campanile, Millard). No cost authority.
Fertility / IVF
- Perplexity "best fertility clinic Denver" AND "...Boulder" both return the same two regional chains in the Places widget: Conceptions Reproductive Associates / RMA and CCRM Fertility (with a Lafayette + Louisville location bleeding into the Boulder query). This is the most consolidated of the four.
- Perplexity "IVF cost Denver": $12k-$30k, cited to cnyfertility (national budget brand), denverfertilitycare (cited 4+ times , the closest thing to a local cost authority), and CCRM's own page. denverfertilitycare is quietly becoming the IVF-cost source.
- Read: two chains with deep review moats own discovery; cost has an emerging local authority already in place. Poor opening for a new independent.
Orthodontics
- Perplexity "best orthodontist Boulder": Places widget, fragmented (Yamashiro 4.6/151, Boulder Orthodontics 4.8/130, Boulder Smile Design 4.9/375).
- Perplexity "best orthodontist Denver": prose with strong editorial-award signals (Colorado Orthodontics "#1 by Colorado Parent," 5280 Magazine top lists, Eberle, Speaks, Trommeter). More awards-driven and consolidated than Boulder.
- Perplexity "braces cost Boulder": the standout finding. The cost numbers ($3,450-$8,050 traditional) are anchored almost entirely to a single aggregator,
dentistsranked, cited repeatedly as THE source, supplemented by nonprofit/charity references (Dental Aid, Smiles Change Lives). This is the same shape as the dentistry implant-cost finding, except the incumbent authority is a generic aggregator, not a local practice. A dated, schema-rich, Boulder-specific braces-cost page for a client could displacedentistsrankedthe way Boulder Dental Center owns implant cost.
3. PART B: nationwide HRT / TRT (local, in-person)
The headline finding answers Annette's core question directly: across every metro and every engine tested, AI surfaces LOCAL, in-person clinics for HRT/TRT/pellet queries. It does NOT default to telehealth brands. Zero Hims, zero Defy, zero Hone in any answer. The local map-pack / Places layer is what feeds these answers. The real competition is not telehealth, it is multi-location TRT FRANCHISES colonizing the local map pack.
Per-metro verdict
| Metro | Engine read | Verdict | Local independents visible? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boulder CO | Perplexity Places: Gameday Men's Health Boulder (5.0/225), Colorado Urology (Ariel Griffin PA-C), INNOVAES Life Optimization | Most OPEN , smallest field, franchise present (Gameday) but not dominant, room for independents | Yes, strongly |
| Denver CO | Perplexity + Grok prose + ChatGPT all name local: Ageless Men's Health (Cherry Creek), BodyLogicMD, Denver Hormone Institute (Dr. Kenton Bruice), ThriveMD, R2 Medical, Renew Vitality, Denver Urology | Open-to-moderate , mix of one long-standing specialist (Denver Hormone Institute) + franchises; no single lock | Yes |
| Phoenix AZ | Perplexity Places HRT: Spectrum Medical, Phoenix Men's Health Center, Identity Hormones. TRT query: Gameday x2, Ageless, Renew Vitality, Activ8 | Moderate , franchises (Gameday, Ageless) entering the map pack but plenty of independents | Yes |
| Nashville TN | Perplexity: lead source a local practice (sommerwhitemd.com); Places: Tennessee Men's Clinic, American Male Medical, Nashville Wellness & IV, Renew Health | OPEN , mostly local/regional names, light franchise presence | Yes, strongly |
| Tampa FL | Perplexity Places: BioDesign Men's Clinic (5.0/1,033), AgeRejuvenation (4.8/686), BioDesign Clinic+MedSpa (4.9/493) | Most CONSOLIDATED , huge local incumbents with 500-1,000+ review moats | Visible but dominated by 2-3 giants |
| Austin TX | Perplexity Places: Gameday, Ageless, Low T Center, Total Men's Primary Care (1,158 reviews) | CONSOLIDATED by franchises , national TRT chains own the map pack | Independents drowned by chains |
Pattern read
- Telehealth is NOT the competitor. This was the key worry and it is unfounded: AI answers for "near me"-style local HRT queries are map-pack-driven and surface brick-and-mortar clinics. Telehealth brands simply do not appear in local-intent answers.
- The real moat is the multi-location TRT franchise. Gameday Men's Health and Ageless Men's Health recur across Phoenix, Austin, Denver, and Boulder. Where they have planted multiple locations (Austin, Phoenix), they crowd the Places widget. Where they have one or none (Nashville, Boulder), independents own the ground.
- Widest local openings (most invisible incumbents, most room): Nashville and Boulder. Both are franchise-light, independent-heavy, and AI surfaces local practice names readily , a clean local-SEO/GBP + review-velocity play would move the answer fast.
- Tightest: Tampa (organic local giants with 1,000-review moats) and Austin (franchise lock). Hard to dislodge.
4. Combined recommendation: rank ALL tested verticals
Scored on opening width x deal value x code-fixability (the SEO Believer GEO lever). Higher = better case-study bet.
| Rank | Vertical | Opening | Deal value | Code-fixability | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dentistry , implant cost (Boulder) | One source (Boulder Dental Center $3,150) feeds every engine | High | Very high (one dated, schema-rich cost page) | LEAD. Highest-probability single AI-citation win in any test. Confirmed prior. |
| 2 | Orthodontics , braces cost (Boulder) | One aggregator (dentistsranked) owns the cost number | Medium-high (long treatment, $3.5k-$8k tickets) | Very high (same structured-cost-page play) | STRONG ADD. New this run. Identical mechanic to implant cost, incumbent is a beatable generic aggregator. |
| 3 | Med spas / aesthetics (Boulder) | Fragmented, no cross-engine name lock | High (recurring, monthly) | High (review velocity + GBP + aggregator cleanup) | KEEP. Already the program's proof vertical; RESTOR named by Claude/Perplexity/Grok. |
| 4 | HRT/TRT , Nashville or Boulder (local) | Wide where franchises are absent | High (recurring memberships) | High (GBP + review velocity + local content) | KEEP as the nationwide/portable play. Telehealth fear unfounded; target franchise-light metros. Boulder is local-market ready; Nashville proves portability. |
| 5 | Cosmetic / plastic surgery (Boulder) | Open, no name lock across engines | Very high (surgical tickets) | Medium (high-trust, big review moats, slower) | OPPORTUNISTIC. Real opening and big deal value, but trust-heavy and crowded in Denver. |
| 6 | Dentistry , cosmetic/veneers (Boulder) | Open on generic queries | High | High | KEEP (prior finding). Move a client from named-by-one-engine to named-by-all. |
| 7 | Orthodontist "best of" (Boulder) | Fragmented but Maps-driven | Medium | Medium (Maps/review play more than content) | Secondary. The cost query (#2) is the real opening, not the "best of." |
| 8 | LASIK / cataract | One incumbent (Dishler) + national chains | High | Low-medium | DROP / opportunistic only. Mature, one entrenched name plus chain advertisers. Like PI law: a poor case-study bet. |
| 9 | Fertility / IVF | Two regional chains own it; cost authority (denverfertilitycare) already exists | Very high | Low | DROP. Most consolidated medical vertical tested. Chain + review moats + an existing cost authority leave little code-fixable ground. |
| , | Personal injury law (prior) | Directory + ad saturation | High | Low | STAYS DROPPED (prior finding). |
Bottom line
The two best new findings are (a) orthodontics braces-cost in Boulder is a near-clone of the implant-cost win , one beatable aggregator owns the number, and a dated schema-rich cost page can take it; and (b) the nationwide HRT probe kills the telehealth worry: AI surfaces local clinics everywhere, so HRT is a legitimate portable local-SEO/GEO product, best sold into franchise-light metros (Nashville, Boulder) and avoided in franchise- or incumbent-locked ones (Austin, Tampa). Fertility and LASIK are the new "PI law" of this test: real money, but closed. Drop them as case-study bets.
Honest boundary (unchanged): these are consideration-phase and citation-layer wins, not proof AI drives more booked revenue than Maps today. Lead client cases with the Maps/organic volume win; layer the AI-citation win as the ahead-of-the-curve proof.
Internal strategy reference · Private · ← Hub