A three-lens review (conversion copy, business plan red-team, AI visibility), with every factual claim verified against the live site before it made this page. Reviews drafted by DeepSeek and MiniMax panels, verified and synthesized by Charlie.
The plan is sound and the site is decent. The two things actually holding the business back are that nothing has been pitched yet, and two broken technical basics (sitemap.xml and /blog both return 404) undercut a site that sells technical SEO.
The AI reviewers made claims I checked against the live site before letting them onto this page. Here's what survived:
| Claim | Verdict | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| sitemap.xml missing | Confirmed 404 | You registered Google Search Console on July 11 and the next step was submitting the sitemap. There's nothing to submit. This is the single most urgent fix. |
| /blog broken | Confirmed 404 | The blog link 404s. For a consultancy selling content and AI-citation expertise, that's a credibility hole. Either ship 3 or 4 foundational posts or remove the link until they exist. |
| Homepage weighs ~6MB | Confirmed, cause found | The HTML itself is only 20KB. The weight is the Colorado hero video (webm + mp4). Compress it hard, poster-image it on mobile, and lazy-load. Keep the blue sky, lose the megabytes. |
| No llms.txt | False | llms.txt exists and serves fine. Ignore any advice built on this claim. |
| Zero schema markup | False, but thin | Two JSON-LD blocks exist (Person, WebPage, PostalAddress). What's missing: Organization/ProfessionalService on the homepage, Service schema on service pages, and FAQPage schema anywhere. |
The conversion review's strongest points, filtered to what fits your rules (no sticky elements, no fake proof):
For "SEO consultant Boulder" type queries, the site needs more entity and authority signals before AIs will cite it. The 30-day list, corrected for what already exists: